Menu
LearnToolsfreeBrokersNewsCommunitysoonPricing
Theme

Stocks and Shares · Managing equity risk · lesson 2 of 9 · 6 min read · David Alexander

Sizing per name: from risk to shares

Download PDF

share sizing

Cash at risk divided by the stop distance: with one share as the unit, the division IS the share count. The platform's sizing arithmetic at its simplest - and with fractional shares removing the rounding step, the computed size and the held size can match exactly, which strips sizing of its last excuse.

Three tracks divided a budget by a per-contract risk. Equities does the same division, and the answer arrives already denominated in shares.

The chain, one unit long

Each share loses exactly the stop distance across the stop - no multiplier, no lookup, no currency leg on a domestic name. Cash at risk divided by stop distance is the share count, full stop. Work the example: the whole machine that took three lessons of commodity plumbing runs here in one line - which is exactly why it gets skipped, and why this lesson exists to make skipping it feel as wrong as it is.

What equities changes about the mechanics

  • The floor rarely bites: fractional shares mean the computed size is usually the held size - the whole-contract compromises of other tracks mostly vanish, and with them the under-budget slack.
  • Position value falls out free: shares times price - and it feeds the per-name cap lesson 6 adds, the second constraint equity sizing carries.
  • Expensive shares change nothing: a four-figure share price just means fewer shares for the same risk - the division does not care, and neither should the trader.

The two-constraint preview

Equity sizing answers to two masters: the risk budget against the stop - this lesson - and the concentration cap against the name, lesson 6's subject, because a stop cannot price the overnight halving. The final size is the smaller of the two answers. That second constraint is new to this track, it exists because ownership concentrates in a way derivative baskets did not, and it is where equity sizing stops being merely the easiest version of the platform's arithmetic.

Worked example

figures in USD

A $100,000 account risking 1% on a domestic name, stop $0.50 away. One share is one unit.

  1. The account risks 1% of $100,000: $1,000, fixed before the chart is opened - three tracks of the same first step.
  2. The stop sits $0.50 away, and one share loses exactly that across it - so the budget buys 2,000 shares at $1,000 of risk.
  3. No multiplier, no conversion, and with fractional shares available the floor rarely bites: equity sizing is the platform's arithmetic at its purest, which leaves no excuse for skipping it.

Check your understanding

Question 1 of 2

Why does equity sizing reduce to a single division?